<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Can IMGG really be worth $500 MILLION?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.beaconequity.com/can-imgg-really-be-worth-500-million/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.beaconequity.com/can-imgg-really-be-worth-500-million/</link>
	<description>Penny Stocks, Stock Picks, Stock Alerts, Small Cap Newsletter</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 05:10:16 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Abu Galib</title>
		<link>http://www.beaconequity.com/can-imgg-really-be-worth-500-million/comment-page-1/#comment-3189</link>
		<dc:creator>Abu Galib</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2009 20:12:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beaconequity.com/?p=6043#comment-3189</guid>
		<description>Who bought those stocks, in the first place? I have started analysing the potential value of the product at stockshealthcare.blogspot.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who bought those stocks, in the first place? I have started analysing the potential value of the product at stockshealthcare.blogspot.com</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thesmartconsumer</title>
		<link>http://www.beaconequity.com/can-imgg-really-be-worth-500-million/comment-page-1/#comment-2997</link>
		<dc:creator>thesmartconsumer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 21:15:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beaconequity.com/?p=6043#comment-2997</guid>
		<description>I am a large stock holder and I&#039;m not gonna say to much because its all been said but the person that wrote this needs to proof read his work. The stock is going to go through the roof. Every hospital in the world will have one of these.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am a large stock holder and I&#8217;m not gonna say to much because its all been said but the person that wrote this needs to proof read his work. The stock is going to go through the roof. Every hospital in the world will have one of these.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Janes</title>
		<link>http://www.beaconequity.com/can-imgg-really-be-worth-500-million/comment-page-1/#comment-2955</link>
		<dc:creator>Janes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 16:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beaconequity.com/?p=6043#comment-2955</guid>
		<description>IMGG is going to end badly.  Lots of red flags here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>IMGG is going to end badly.  Lots of red flags here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: acm</title>
		<link>http://www.beaconequity.com/can-imgg-really-be-worth-500-million/comment-page-1/#comment-2949</link>
		<dc:creator>acm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 14:27:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beaconequity.com/?p=6043#comment-2949</guid>
		<description>This type of analysis is really worthless.  The real questions to ask are

Is the product real? (We know it is). 
Does it work? (We know it does).  
Does it have a legitimate chance at FDA approval? (we know it does).
Is there patent protection? (Yes)
What is the market for the product? (We know it is big and can estimate ourselves with proper dd).  
Are there similar products on the market? (No)
What is the potential profit per share and appropriate multiple? (Easy to do with the other answers)

If you can answer these question with confidence in the manner I have, you are long.  If you can&#039;t, you rely on incomplete facts, flawed analysis, etc such as this.  For instance, the chief question of the article ... why hasn&#039;t the company sold a product for which they do not have FDA approval?  I think anyone can realize that is a pretty dumb question.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This type of analysis is really worthless.  The real questions to ask are</p>
<p>Is the product real? (We know it is).<br />
Does it work? (We know it does).<br />
Does it have a legitimate chance at FDA approval? (we know it does).<br />
Is there patent protection? (Yes)<br />
What is the market for the product? (We know it is big and can estimate ourselves with proper dd).<br />
Are there similar products on the market? (No)<br />
What is the potential profit per share and appropriate multiple? (Easy to do with the other answers)</p>
<p>If you can answer these question with confidence in the manner I have, you are long.  If you can&#8217;t, you rely on incomplete facts, flawed analysis, etc such as this.  For instance, the chief question of the article &#8230; why hasn&#8217;t the company sold a product for which they do not have FDA approval?  I think anyone can realize that is a pretty dumb question.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Beacon. Right.</title>
		<link>http://www.beaconequity.com/can-imgg-really-be-worth-500-million/comment-page-1/#comment-2948</link>
		<dc:creator>Beacon. Right.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 03:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beaconequity.com/?p=6043#comment-2948</guid>
		<description>WOW. What a hard bash. Reported by someone unfamiliar with the potential of the product, the progress of the FDA process, and why it has impacted the pps.

Yep. No agenda here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WOW. What a hard bash. Reported by someone unfamiliar with the potential of the product, the progress of the FDA process, and why it has impacted the pps.</p>
<p>Yep. No agenda here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DES</title>
		<link>http://www.beaconequity.com/can-imgg-really-be-worth-500-million/comment-page-1/#comment-2946</link>
		<dc:creator>DES</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 01:26:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beaconequity.com/?p=6043#comment-2946</guid>
		<description>They raised that money with that low share price when it was trading in the penny range durring the summer.  The deal was signed then.  When it finally got the funds and it became public the stock was in the high .20&#039;s to low 30&#039;s.  Nothing fishy about that if you have the big picture.  Do some DD.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They raised that money with that low share price when it was trading in the penny range durring the summer.  The deal was signed then.  When it finally got the funds and it became public the stock was in the high .20&#8217;s to low 30&#8217;s.  Nothing fishy about that if you have the big picture.  Do some DD.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: deen janes</title>
		<link>http://www.beaconequity.com/can-imgg-really-be-worth-500-million/comment-page-1/#comment-2945</link>
		<dc:creator>deen janes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 00:07:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beaconequity.com/?p=6043#comment-2945</guid>
		<description>So you weren&#039;t calling it a silly machine a few weeks ago Beacon? Now all the sudden its silly? ROFL@geekin equity! hahahah YOU HAVE BEEN EXPOSED!!!! HAHAHAHAHAH</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So you weren&#8217;t calling it a silly machine a few weeks ago Beacon? Now all the sudden its silly? ROFL@geekin equity! hahahah YOU HAVE BEEN EXPOSED!!!! HAHAHAHAHAH</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
